« The Sunday Salon #24: What the Body Remembers- Week Two | Main | The Sunday Salon #23: What the Body Remembers »

Weekly Geeks #16

This week Dewey had us pair up with another WG and we interviewed each other about a book we'd read.

I got some great questions from Terri about the Life of Pi by Yann Martel which I read a few years ago, but it was in my pre-blogging days.  Answering her questions made me realize, again, how much I really like this book. 

1.    Framework -  The majority of the novel is in first person  POV  -  is it effective?  Could it have been told any other way?

Having the story told in first person added to the elements of surprise and uncertainty.  I also enjoyed reading how the author's voice matures.  I am sure that the novel could be told in another way, but I am not sure if I would have liked the book as much.
2.    The story is bookended by the author's note and by Part Three, both of which attempt to convince the reader that the story is true. Did that add to the novel for you or detract from it?

The author's note and part Three both added to the story for me. I found myself forgetting that the story is fiction. When we discussed the novel in book club, I had to be convinced that the author's note was part of the fictional novel.  Actually, I will admit that I am still not sure if the author's note is part of the fiction or a real note.

3.    Ending - how did you feel about having two possible stories - why do you think the author did that? 

I think that the author had two possible endings to add a twist to the end. All of a sudden, you begin questioning everything you read. It is a great way to review the book just before you finish reading.  Plus, deciding which story you believe is a great book club discussion topic.
4.    What was your favorite (or most memorable) scene in the book?

When Pi stands on his boat in the middle of the ocean and makes declarations to God. There is something so powerful in seeing him renew his optimism.
5.    Did the author build tension effectively in the story?

Honestly, I cannot remember.  Although, I do think that the author did a good job developing the relationship between Pi and the Tiger.
6.    We learn that Pi's father once ran the Pondicherry Zoo, teaching Pi and his brother, Ravi, about the dangerous nature of animals by feeding a live goat to a tiger before their young eyes. Do you think the animals served a symbolic purpose in the story?  If so, what? (Specifically: tiger, hyena, orangutan, zebra, meerkat.)

Yes, I think that the animals did serve a symbolic purpose in the story.  Each one could have been connected to a particular family member.  Also, I think that the animals served as markers for the various points in Pi's development.

7.    Do you think the story was fantastic enough to give one a faith in God as Francis Adirubasamy promised in the intro?

Even though I loved the book, I do not think that it was fantastic enough to give one faith in God.  However, I do think that the story is large enough to give birth to hope and possibility.
8.    How did you feel when you finished the book?  Satisfied? Frustrated? Amazed? Wanting more?

I felt surprised when I finished the book because of the possibility that there are two explanations to things. 
9.    Overall impressions:  Did you like this book? Would you recommend it to others?  Rate the book between 1-10.  Would you read this author again?

I did like the book. I would recommend it to the others. During the first holiday season after I finished reading the book, I gave copies to several of my friends with post it notes to mark my favorite passages.  Yes, i would like to read this author again.


Now, onto my partner's interview.

To someone who is unfamiliar with the work of Elizabeth Strout, would you say that Olive Kitteridge was a good introduction to her writing? How does it compare to her other work?

This is the first Strout book I’ve read; I have her book Amy and Isabel on my TBR shelf (it was short listed for the Orange Prize) and will read it in 2009 for the Orange January read.

Which story was your favorite and why?

I loved the last story, "River." It showed some growth and change in Olive, finally an ability to examine her beliefs and her rigidness. It was nice to see her finally melt into her life and let go a bit.

From what POV were the stories told?

3rd Person, with a shifting narrator throughout the book. This is very effective for perspective and depth of the characters.

How did you like the short story format as compared to the novel format?

I do love a good collection of short stories and have been reading more of the genre lately. Olive Kitteridge felt like something in between short stories and a novel because of the recurring characters. We see Olive in every story, sometimes as the central character, sometimes as a peripheral character and a couple of times, just as a mention, referring to something she said or did. What I loved about this format was it gave an insight into Olive's character from so many different perspectives that we wouldn't have gotten had there been just one narrator.

What are some of your favorite lines from the book?

"What young people didn’t know, she thought, lying down beside this man, his hand on her shoulder, her arm; oh, what young people did not know. They did not know that lumpy, aged, and wrinkled bodies were as needy as their own young, firm ones, that love was not to be tossed away carelessly, as if it were a tart on a platter with others that got passed around again. " (p.270)

"But the gesture, the smooth cupping of the little girl’s head, the way Suzanne’s hand in one quick motion caressed the fine hair and thin neck, has stayed with Olive. It was like watching some woman dive from a boat and swim easily up to the dock. A reminder how some people could do things others could not." (p. 64)

To what does the title refer?

Olive Kitteridge, a retired schoolteacher, is present in each of the stories, some more than others. She is not like a center that the other lives revolve around (almost the opposite), but someone who touches the lives of all the stories’ characters. And not always in a positive way.

How did the short stories contribute to your understanding of people in Maine? Are there some unique characteristics of folks from Maine or something unique about the way of life there?

I don’t think these characters are unique to Maine. I think they are quite ordinary and somewhat universal.

What made you decide to read this book?

It had been receiving rave reviews on LibraryThing and I’ve had it on my TBR list for quite awhile. Then one of the LT groups I belong to decided to read it for a group read.

Who do you think would enjoy this book? Who would not enjoy it? Would you read it again?

The book has been compared to Sherwood Anderson’s Winesburg, Ohio. I think people who enjoy short stories would enjoy it, as would people who enjoy character driven books. Much of the focus is on relationships – someone who doesn’t care to read about relationships, growth and change would probably not like this book. I would definitely read this one again – I think I would get a deeper understanding of the characters.

Who was your favorite character and why?

I liked Olive's second daughter-in-law, Ann. She was straightforward, had no pretenses and was very open to people of all types.

Posted on Sunday, September 14, 2008 at 11:24PM by Registered Commenter[beastmomma] | CommentsPost a Comment

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.